Why corrections matter
YONODUNIYA covers app identities, current search-visible names, Android issues and user-reported withdrawal outcomes that can change quickly. A dated correction trail is more trustworthy than silently replacing old claims.
What we correct
- Wrong app identity or similarly named app confusion.
- Incorrect or outdated launch/first-seen dates.
- Withdrawal reports that later resolve.
- Broken or outdated internal information.
- Incorrect developer, package, version or source claims.
- Legal/current-status wording that becomes outdated.
How status corrections work
If a user initially reports “withdrawal pending” and later receives the payment, we prefer to preserve both events: the original pending date and the later resolution. Likewise, a recent successful receipt is not converted into a permanent “paying” label.
Evidence labels
VERIFIED is reserved for a specific claim supported by sufficient reliable evidence. SOURCE-REPORTED means a source states it. USER-REPORTED means a user supplied the outcome. NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED means the evidence is insufficient for a stronger claim.
Send a correction
Email support@yonoduniya.com with the exact page URL, the statement to review, and supporting information. For transaction reports, redact private financial/account data.
Privacy boundary
Do not send OTPs, passwords, UPI PINs, complete bank details or identity documents. YONODUNIYA is an informational website and cannot recover accounts or process payments.
No paid status upgrades
A listing should not receive a more favorable verification or withdrawal label because of sponsorship, payment or referral value. The status should reflect the evidence available to the editorial process.
Correction examples
Launch date: if a page says “launched 9 September” based only on directory evidence and a primary source later shows 7 September, the page should change the date, record the source improvement and retain the prior estimate in the editorial log where useful.
Withdrawal: if a pending report later resolves, the current status should reflect the resolution without deleting the fact that a delay occurred.
App identity: if two similarly named apps are later proven to have different package/developer identities, links, icons and status reports should be separated immediately.
What does not count as evidence for a correction?
Anonymous promotional claims, copied bonus tables, screenshots with no identifiable context and requests to remove accurate information solely because it is unfavorable do not automatically justify a change. We review the underlying claim and the quality of the new evidence.
Freshness and review timing
Time-sensitive pages should be reviewed when new evidence arrives rather than on an arbitrary daily schedule. A visible “last checked” date should mean the underlying information was actually reviewed. Cosmetic date changes without verification reduce trust and should be avoided.
Corrections versus removals
If a statement was accurate as a dated user report but later changed, the better editorial response is often to add the resolution rather than erase the earlier event. Content should be removed when it is wrong, privacy-sensitive, unsupported or no longer useful—not simply because a later outcome is more favorable.